I removed other shaders. using just flatkit in my project. developer is very responsive. and updates are periodically.

I normally don’t buy assets, but this one is a must-have. It really helps give your project a unique visual identity and eliminates that generic “Unity look” that many projects tend to have.

Chefs kiss

I am very happy with this asset. Super simple to use (even for a dummy like me) gives you top quality visuals to give your game a very polished look, and the most responsive and helpful support. If you are thinking about buying this asset, go ahead, you will not regret it a bit.

Well worth the price. Thank you!

I’m really impressed with this package, its visual results made a noticeable difference in my game’s aesthetic. The shaders are cleanly written, which made customizing them to suit my vision straightforward and efficient. I did encounter a bug during integration, but the developer support was outstanding. They responded quickly and resolved the issue in a timely manner. I’d highly recommend this package.

Been using this asset pack for years and it's finally time to leave the review it deserves. Can't recommend this product enough. Easy to use shaders, clean look and very versatile. If you're someone who has a very stylized and toon look I always send them this way. Definitely worth the cost full price and it's an outright steal on sale. To the devs, keep up the good work and thank you for taking the time to make this asset.

Bought for the outline, and it was a bit of a disappointment. Started out with a default pipeline project, the shader, the outlines and all the features looked promising, but with default render pipeline workflow were a bit sketchy, no resolution independent outline width, and even a missing advertiesed feature: no color based outlines in the default pipeline. I had to use the screen effect ith per-mesh outlines on material combined to get a somewhat okay look. Working with it basicly impossible as in scene view all the outlines messed up compared to game view due to resolution differences, also there where multiple rendering errors like double-vision liked outlines, and the outline witdh varied all over the scene, whuch is a bit disturbing. Manual stated that URP is recommended so I switched. It turned out, that URP version is even worse, more rendering error, like the double-vision one all over the screen, also some depth problems with shadows as shadows clears out depth based normals and with MSAA the outlines looked broken. It is clear the package have a lot of work in it, but visually it offer subpar quality. Edit: To react to the reply, not talking about edge color but the feature color based outlines. And no, I'm not just converted the BIRP project but actually started over with a fresh project. And one more clarification: I noted and understand you moved on to URP, no problem with that. Having worse quality in URP and with recommended use (like not having mesh hull outlines) is what I don't like. I Will send shots via email but I'm pretty sure Im not telling surprising news as I used the shader for like an hour and experienced all kind of grpahics artifacts - so probably all of them well known by you. The one reason I originally not asked for refund is that maybe I will use the toon shader itself.

Overview: I am currently using this in a project but unfortunately I can't use the toon shading because most of the project is already using custom shaders so I can blend the world together for a melting ability, I know you of course can't have a material using 2 shaders at once but it is still pretty inconvenient and I wish there was a full screen cell shader or something kind of like the other screen space effects. Water: Also the water shader is using screen instead of world space depth calculations so it's pretty useless for games with moving cameras but fine for a still shot like in the demos, I ended up writing my own world space water shader instead of using flat kit's. Conclusion: Over all great customisable asset that can and can and will produce great results if you tune and tweak it for you're needs, would recommend buying as long as you don't have to have nice looking water or you have to many custom shaders in you're project! EDIT: I think you misunderstood what I ment with world space depth calculations, here is a water shader tutorial that has a very good explanation of depth calculations: https://ameye.dev/notes/stylized-water-shader/ Check section two Figuring out the depth of the water, and sorry I meant camera-relative depth. But big thanks for the new update, I added that functionality to my water shader using your code as a base! Will change to five stars if you add world space depth calculations, I also found that if you use the magnitude instead of the y component of the calculated depth vector for non flat objects you get very good results, I hope you find this helpful and that you add this to the otherwise amazing water shader! You know what, I think I just give up on the water, I still have my own shader that is much better and in shader graph, the stylised surface shader is very good though, you wont regret buying if you want only that (I certainly have not)!

Works in the tiny demo. Breaks or becomes useless for large terrains. No scalable shader projection or mesh-based world tiling. Shader doesn’t respond to object scaling—only modifies UV tiling, not visible world space. Basically: FlatKit’s water shader isn’t designed for large open-world maps. It’s tailored to hand-placed prefab areas with hardcoded scale expectations, which is lazy design if you’re building anything beyond their demo box. And the publisher's reply to other one star review is such a PR sidestep—no fix, no commitment to improvement, just “buy the other one too and it wont fix this issue, but I will get more of your money.” Lame.