Using the ORK Framework is more fun than any other aspect of gaming.

It has an unparalleled functionality as a tool for creating RPGs. However, it is very difficult to master it. The areas that are particularly difficult and lack documentation are how to handle objects, prefabs, NPC movement, animation, etc., and the schematics for handling them. We can understand how to build and set the database for abilities, items, and monsters by reading the documentation and using it for a while. Those who have used the RPG Maker series may be surprised at the huge number of settings that can be set, but they will be able to use it. However, moving or animating objects and NPCs can be difficult. The settings are spread across multiple, scattered locations, there are similar settings in multiple places, and there are many settings that are not explained and are likely to never be used. In addition, in order for the schematics to work properly, users must spawn prefabs and specify objects in advance, but because the documentation does not explain this, users mistakenly think that ORK is unnecessarily difficult and that there are many functions that they cannot use. If GIL provided documentation and demo scenes that explained these things properly, I would be able to understand ORK much faster. If demo scenes were prepared that allowed users to manipulate objects and NPCs, users would be able to imitate them and learn a lot. I think the functionality is already comprehensive enough, so I would like the explanations of those functions to be more thorough. I think this is probably because the program code has been framed as a GUI. But the program won't work unless properly specify the target. I think that kind of thing is missing from the instructions. It may be the best asset once you master how to use it, but that's my impression after using it for a month.

First of all, thank you to the author for their hard work! Then, I couldn't resist complaining that the learning document was too dull. I hope there are more engaging teaching methods, such as videos. And more game cases.

The asset is good and versatile. If you invest some time learning, it's really handy But there are really big problems as well UI is too crowded and confusing, it's almost feeling claustrophobic to just look at it. There is a guide on the website yes, but too complex for new starters which is a massive con from an asset claims "building own rpg without any single line of code" Generally learning curve is too high for the asset. I saw many projects with this asset so I know it can be used good but need better UI and guides for newly starting users.

I have been with GIL since the very first okashi kit and I'm never disappointed. The feature set is incredible. I would recommended this to anyone familiar with frameworks. Because this is tops!

If you're making a jrpg game ORK is probably great. If you're producing an old school dungeon crawler it is probably great. But due to the lack of a decent 3rd person controller of any kind and the creator's total disinterest in supporting any 3rd party controller ORK will never be capable of anything else. The creator claims that ORK supports action games but not really. It supports a very crappy action controller and absolutely no other action controller. There is a youtube tutorial that can help you integrate GKC but the process is very difficult to say the least. And the GKC is loaded with many extras that are not modular. And due to the complexity of both systems they don't really fit well together. There would many overlapping features anyway. I give ORK 3 stars because it will do some things really, really well and overall the system is good as long as you're not trying to make a good quality action rpg game. RE: You're correct it is POSSIBLE to create an action RPG controller. In the same way that it is POSSIBLE to create one in Unity. But there's no built-in support for one except a now outdated basic Unity controller. I realize that it isn't meant to do ONLY action RPG games. But I hope that for ORK 4 you will consider a controller upgrade.

This is a fantastic product. It's huge, it's very deep, it's robust, and it makes sense. There is a learning curve to ORK but the developer GiL (Gaming is Love) is very active in the forums and answers questions clearly and usually pretty quickly. Work through a few tutorials first (they take awhile), you won't get it all, but it will start clicking eventually.

FULL of potential for any type of RPG you may want to create. Author is VERY helpful and active on forum, and new features are constantly being added. The downside is that there is a steep learning curve, though there are basic tutorials to get you on your way. You've got a console with a million buttons, luckily most of them (if not all) have tool-tips. I have not tried any other framework, not do I feel the need to explore other options.

I want to know how to use ORK by source code instead dll

This framework is exactly what I needed because I couldn't write code of my own no matter how many tutorials I watched. This is perfect for someone who doesn't want to code. The controls are very informative as to what they do. Once you've learned the base controls, step up to get into the finer details. At the very least, I urge you to try the free version to see if this is for you.