error ：NetworkConnection conn conn.connectionId CombatHandler.cs row 63 OnFightCreature Use new Mirror

When I opened project it shows Visual Studio Code is not supported, and several pakages is deprecated, and compiler shows this:Assets\CCGKit\Core\Scripts\Foundation\Networking\NetworkProtocol.cs(145,16): error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'NetworkInstanceId' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)(And other 83 errors ) How can i fix it? Thanks.

It woks, the code is clean and easy to understand, and once you dedicate the time is really easy to customize. 2 things that could be better in terms of code quality. 1) use enums, instead of magic strings 2) If possible, use generics instead of reflection to achieve some functionalities (this would be a great improvement that will make easier adapt this to mobile) Also, would be great if I can contact the author, modifying some things the game now throws when getting arguments from commandline, and I don't know how to fix it (it was a mistake I did, nothing to do with the quality of this asset that is awesome)

VERY COOL SYSTEM. But where do I edit the scripts to create new card types?

First off, this is a system. Yes, it comes with a demo game, but the author is very clear to point out that this is a demo only, and if you want to implement further AAA features you would have to write your own code. That's completely acceptable. The editor alone is worth the price of admission, and the multiplayer code is also a godsend. Plus, don't asset flip. Just don't do it. Take the example game, and the framework, and start your own game. Modifying the DEMO game is akin to asset flipping, and complaining that you can't just drop the demo game onto the game store makes me think that people are planning that. Regarding the multiplayer code. The author explicitly points out how they decided to implement it - server authoritive vs P2P. For a competitive game it's almost always a good idea to go server authoritive. It reduces the chances of hacking and client side exploits. Never trust the client is something you will hear often in multiplayer games. Simple and casual games that are cooperative can benefit from P2P, but as soon as you have a trust issue (as is the case with competition) you must go server authoritive. This is an awesome asset that will give you a HUGE jump on any CCG or TCG game you might want to start. Yes, there is a lot you will have to add to it in order to make a AAA game, but the title of the asset is Kit, not AAA Game. So, it's up to you to create the next AAA CCG or TCG game with this kit.

Not sure where my review went but I agree with others on the shortcomings of this asset.

So not only do I agree with others that the documentation is lacking but the networking documentation is closer to non existent! I can't even call it matchmaking as it's just room lobbies. That's just setting up a connection no matching required... P2P would have been the easier option both to use and make but instead they are using THEIR OWN server kit which is, you guessed it, not even meant to be used for ccgs... So not only is this hardly a ccg kit it even contains spamware for their other products. I'm sorry but this is more useless to me than a pseudocode. AND IT COSTS MONEY

For beginner little but tricky then after it will be piece of cake I update my 3 to 5 stars. But docs need to update even beginners can be deploy in production environment.

Been working with this asset and very happy with the development. The Creator is very active and helpful.

I think this asset gives you exactly what is shown and is very well put together, I have had so much joy working with it. That being said I feel the wiki is perfect for confident developers that can hop into a code base and they can use the wiki to learn how everything works fast and start experimenting adding their own effects and so on to the asset, but the wiki lacks hand holding tutorials for newer developers. While I have had nothing but good things to say about this kit, me a few years ago would have had a hard time with this kit.